12 February 2014

Far-reaching ruling from the European court of justice on private persons' purchase of copied products on the internet

On 6 February 2014, the ECJ delivered a spectacular ruling in a case concerning a Dane's Internet purchase of a copy of a Rolex watch from China. 

The ruling reflects a broader interpretation of the customs regulation than seen so far, and it may have far-reaching implications for Internet trade.  


As previously mentioned in our Newsletter of 12 March 2013 the Supreme Court presented a number of prejudicial questions to the ECJ concerning the scope of the rules of the customs regulation enabling customs authorities to intervene against goods infringing trademark or intellectual property rights. 

These questions were asked as part of the pending case where a Dane had bought a copy of a Rolex watch on the Internet. Subsequently, the watch was withheld by the Danish customs authorities. 

However, as the watch was unquestionably bought for private purposes, the Dane had not infringed Rolex' trademark or intellectual property rights. The question was then whether the Chinese seller had infringed Rolex' rights in Denmark by way of sale via the Internet. 

In that case, the customs authorities would be entitled to destroy the watch under the customs regulation. 


According to the ECJ's previous practice concerning Internet sale, importance has been attached to the criterion that, in order for an infringement to exist in this area by virtue of the website, the website must address the consumers of the territory in question before. 

 In this connection, the ECJ has stated in a case between Ebay and L'oreal that the availability of a website within a territory is not sufficient in order for a website to address the consumers of that territory. 


Taking the above into account, it is surprising that the ECJ now states in the Rolex case that the mere fact that the watch was purchased is sufficient to establish an infringement. 

It is therefore not necessary that marketing or offers have been addressed to the Danish consumers in advance.  

The ruling is far-reaching as it implies that the moment a product is purchased on the Internet - irrespective of where in the world the seller is located - European intellectual property rights may be infringed if the buyer is located within the EU. 

This extension of the rights of the rights holder is also what is proposed by the European Commission in a new trademark directive aiming at providing an extended right to the rights holders to oppose import of infringing products. 

The rights holders may, for example, now oppose import even if only the sender is acting commercially. 

New rankings from Chambers

13 March 2018

Chambers, the leading international guide to the best law firms, ranks Horten as one of the best in the country yet again.

Chambers nominates Horten as Greenland expert

21 February 2018

The recognised international ranking agency Chambers has ranked Horten as one of the country’s leading law firms specialised in the conditions prevailing in Greenland.

Unique cooperation between Horten and Symbion

5 February 2018

Horten has entered into unique cooperation with Symbion and Accelerace where we will make a team of lawyers available for start-up businesses at the shared office facilities Horten CoLab.

Horten obtains top ranking in WTR1000

26 January 2018

World Trademark Review 1000 recently published its rankings for 2018. Once again, Horten obtained a top ranking.

New rules on processing of payment data from 2018

9 January 2018

New and more lenient rules on processing of payment data came into force at the turn of the year. We provide you with an overview of the new rules.

New Managing Partner at Horten

2 January 2018

Finn Schwarz, Attorney and Partner, has been appointed Managing Partner of Horten Law Firm as of 1 January 2018.

Judgment in the Coty case: Prohibition against use of third party's online platform was not unlawful

12 December 2017

On 6 December 2017, the European Court of Justice ruled that cosmetics manufacturer Coty's prohibition against internet sale via third parties was not unlawful.

European ip rights in Great Britain after Brexit

19 September 2017

Great Britain's exit from the EU will create uncertainty for both British and EU27 companies in relation to the extent and protection of intellectual property rights in Great Britain. It is therefore of great interest and importance to clarify the consequences of Great Britain’s exit and how to handle them.

The edtech company Labster announces Series A investment

7 September 2017

Labster recently announced a Series A investment round of $ 10 million with the participation of the venture capital funds Balderton Capital and Northzone.

The Maritime and Commercial High Court states: Hästens' trademark infringed

18 August 2017

The Maritime and Commercial High Court has ruled that Hästens Sängar AB’s blue check pattern is a (well-known) trademark in Denmark. The manufacturer Nordicform AS, Magasin and a number of other distributors have thereby infringed Hästens’ trademark rights and violated the Danish Marketing Practices Act by selling bedclothes with the blue check pattern, and they must pay compensation.

Google - an overview of the summer’s EU case against the internet giant

27 July 2017

In June 2017, the European Commission ruled in the first of three pending cases against Google and ordered Google to pay a record-high fine of EUR 2.42 billion for abuse of its dominant position. According to the European Commission, Google favoured Google Shopping in its search engine.

Still waiting for a European Patent Court

20 June 2017

The agreement concerning the European Patent Court is once again delayed. The agreement concerning the establishment of a so-called unitary patent and a joint patent court was planned to come into force in December 2017, but this will presumably not be the case.

Horten advances in new Chambers and Legal 500 rankings

19 April 2017

In 2017, the leading international ranking agencies, Legal 500 and Chambers, are once again ranking Horten among the best law firms in Denmark.

Comparative markets - supermarkets and hypermarkets

9 March 2017

The CJEU recently issued its ruling in case C-562/15 on comparative advertising comparing prizes between shops of different sizes and formats.

Global Leaders in Law appoints Horten as exclusive partner for Denmark

10 January 2017

Global Leaders in Law, the leading global general counsel forum based in London, and Horten has announced partnership. Appointed as a global bronze partner, Horten will sponsor the activities of Global Leaders in Law in 2017.

Greenland adopts personal data act

22 November 2016

From 1 December 2016, the Personal Data Act became effective in Greenland at the request of the Greenland Home Rule. The Act replaces the data protection legislation from 1978, which has applied in Greenland until now.

Dynamic IP addresses may constitute personal data

19 October 2016

The European Court of Justice recently ruled in C-582/14 that a dynamic IP address may constitute personal data.

Horten on two committees at the Confederation of Danish Industry, DI

3 October 2016

DI has re-appointed Søren Hornbæk Svendsen as member of the Energy and Climate Policy Committee and Nina Henningsen as member of the Media Policy Committee.

Internet media under pressure because of new EU ruling

15 September 2016

The latest ruling on hyper links and copyright confirms previous case law and adds a new rule of presumption, which may threaten the existence of some Internet media.

Easier for customs to stop copied products

14 September 2016

According to new EU rules, the owner of a product must, in the event of a trademark dispute, prove that the product is not a copy.

Circle K wins over OK in legal action concerning a new logo - Horten assisted Circle K

25 August 2016

Horten has assisted Circle K in a legal action against OK. OK claimed that Circle K's new logo infringed the company's trademark rights to OK and was therefore contrary to the Trademark Act.

New rules on trade secrets in the pipeline

27 June 2016

At the end of 2013, the European Commission presented a draft directive on the legal protection of trade secrets. After more than two years' negotiations between the European Commission, the European Parliament and the Member States, political agreement was reached on a final draft shortly before Christmas. The revised directive was finally adopted by the Council on 26 May 2016.

Horten is promoted to the gold tier for 2016 in IAM Patent 1000

8 June 2016

Glowing reports from peers and patrons see Horten promoted to the gold tier for 2016. It is “a force to be reckoned with in high-stakes litigation”.

New association: The Danish association for marketing law

13 April 2016

11 of Denmark's leading experts within marketing law have established the Danish Association for Marketing Law. The association's first arrangement will take place on 3 May and focus on hidden advertising.

Horten Corporate Day 2016 - Danish companies at the forefront

18 March 2016

At Horten's Corporate Day 2016 on 16 March, Danish and foreign executives and experts gave their views on the trends and opportunities of the Danish business sector. Horten will repeat the success next year with Horten Corporate Day 2017.

The Eastern High Court: Pressalit infringed Tivoli's trademark and breached the licence agreement

2 March 2016

In January 2016, the Eastern High Court ruled in the appeal proceedings between Tivoli A/S and Pressalit Group A/S.

New online dispute portal and requirements for web shops

19 January 2016

In the future, all Danish and EU web shops must link to the pan-European online dispute portal ODR (Online Dispute Resolution). ODR will be available from 15 February 2016.

New survey: Horten among the best within trademarks

18 January 2016

The recognised international magazine World Trademark Review (WTR) elects Horten as one of the country's leading advisers within trademark law.

New practice on diminished value in online purchasing

13 January 2016

A failure to state the cancellation terms entitles the consumer to a full refund if the purchase is cancelled within 14 days.